Week 9 - Critical Review of Dance Piece #2
Woolf Works by Wayne McGregor was choreographed in 2015 and was
performed by The Royal Ballet. The stimulus of the piece was “themes from three of Woolf's landmark
novels, Mrs Dalloway, Orlando, and The Waves, with elements of her letters, essays and
diaries.” (Studio Wayne McGregor, 2019). Similar to ‘Infra’, the music was composed by Max Richter and
the score was specially commissioned for the piece incorporating electronic and
orchestral music (Roh.org.uk, 2019).
The piece starts with one large white
spotlight on the stage with travelling sequences across the spotlight in pairs.
The duet work includes jumps such as pas de chats, temps levés and small leaps. There is also travelling lifts
with jumps, kicks and slides, also plies and lots of body ripples. The movement is constantly drifting into and
out of the spotlight like an eb and flow.
The theme of moving through the spotlight
is continued throughout the piece as they increase to 3 spotlights while the
dancers are in a straight-line doing movements in canon which reduces to two
spotlights as the dancers are in two circles. The lighting within this piece
was used a lot more and had a greater impact on the piece than in ‘Infra’ as there
was just a beam of white light coming from the side rather than the lighting
being used directly in the piece, affecting the movement and pathways.
Similar to ‘Infra’, ‘Woolf Works’
has relatively simple costumes, the female dancers are wearing a nude leotard and
the male dancers wear a similar bike-tard type costume. This allows the form of
the body to be seen but also allows the focus to be on the movement rather than
the costume.
This piece had a chaotic energy due
to lots of change in direction, running and jumping. Also, it is a group piece
including duets and solos as well as incorporating unison and canon. In
contrast, the extract from ‘Infra’ that I reviewed was a duet and they mostly
danced in contact and was calmer and more controlled with leg extensions, lifts
and gestures showing the relationship between the dancers. Whereas ‘Woolf Works’
was more energetic and disordered was harder to establish a relationship
between the dancers. Additionally, the piece contains a lot more variety within
movement and choreographic devices due to it being a group piece it is able to use
canon which is seen less in the ‘Infra’ duet. The use of these techniques allows the tension
to build within the piece and keeps the audience involved and stimulated when
watching.
“Woolf Works won Best New Dance Production at the
Olivier Awards, with Ferri the recipient of the award
for Outstanding Achievement in Dance. Woolf Works is also the winner of two
National Dance Awards - Wayne McGregor was awarded Best Classical
Choreography, and Alessandra Ferri won Best Female Dancer for her performance .” (Studio Wayne McGregor, 2019).
Bibliography
Roh.org.uk. (2019). Woolf
Works — Productions — Royal Opera House. [online] Available at:
https://www.roh.org.uk/productions/woolf-works-by-wayne-mcgregor [Accessed 10
Nov. 2019].
Studio Wayne McGregor.
(2019). Woolf Works. [online] Available at: https://waynemcgregor.com/productions/woolf-works
[Accessed 10 Nov. 2019].
Woolf Works - Wayne McGregor ( video link )
This is a very good blog post. You have compared 'Woolf Works' to 'Infra' very well. Additionally, I like the way you have gone into detail about the movements featured in this piece and discussed the energy expressed. Overall did you enjoy watching this piece of choreography?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. Yes, I did enjoy this piece as I felt very engaged while watching it and thought it was quite exciting to watch due to the pathways the dancers made which were constantly changing. Additionally, there was a lot of travelling jumps and lifts at a fast pace which added highlights and also kept suspense within the audience. I like that it is a group piece as it allows more varied shapes and pathways to be used compared to a solo or duet.
DeleteWell done, this is a great blog! You spoke about the use of the spotlight throughout the piece and the impact this gave, why do you think this is so effective? And did you like how the dancers were travelling into the spotlight?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I think the use of the spotlight was effective as it gave direction to the piece and obviously had significance within the piece as the movement was travelling around or through the spotlights. This gave structure to the dance as it enabled pathways to be established and highlighted the dancers. I liked this because the movement through the spotlight added a lot of excitement and suspense to the piece due to the jumps and lifts that travelled through it.
DeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog and how you interpreted the piece Mhairi, I was wondering if you thought why McGregor decided to use the moving spotlights throughout and whether this added to the piece at all?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I think he decided to use them to complement the movements and patterns he has created as it is almost like the dancers are reacting to the light through their movement. I think it added a lot as it changed throughout the piece so it added a lot of interest to the audience rather than just one light setting.
DeleteDo you think having a commissioned piece of music to work to affected the choreography? Did the unique music create a more unique movement, as opposed to using something already in existance?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I definitely feel that the piece having its own commissioned music led to much more unique movement as the music was uniquely made for the piece. I liked this as I felt the movement and the music were very suited due to this.
DeleteYou have included some interesting points discussing McGregor's piece, however, I would like you to go into further detail when analysing and comparing the piece to other works. In your view, what do you think the piece trying to communicate or say to its audience? Please further discuss the style and movement used? What is the purpose behind the choreography and what impact did the music have and how did this have an effect on the piece? In your opinion, do you think the piece was successful - were there any parts you liked/disliked? In comparison to your first critical analysis, can you notice any similarities and differences between the two pieces? Please expand your analysis by discussing how the emotion and dynamic/ intention differed? Overall a well presented critical analysis.
ReplyDelete
DeleteThank you for your comment. I think the piece is trying to communicate the idea of freedom due to the use of jumps, runs, lifts and travelling steps. Also, the spotlights may be implying the idea of hope or light at the end of the tunnel. The movement was very energetic while still flowing well, it wasn’t particularly sharp however it still had a lot of energy and power behind it. The music was quite dramatic, complementing the movement well, the music and the highlights of the dance suited each other well. I think this piece was successful as the movement created was very powerful to the audience when watching. However, I disliked that it was difficult to fully understand the stimulus as I've not read the novels, so the intention of the piece was not fully portrayed to me. The first piece I analysed was a lot softer, had less jumps and was more grounded whereas this piece has a lot more excitement in it. The emotion in the first piece was a lot more mellow, trying the show the relationship between the two dancers and the love between them. Woolf works didn’t really have much emotion behind it from what I could tell, potentially anger?